fokireading.blogg.se - 4chan pol into the trash it goes

#4chan pol into the trash it goes archive#

Wow you win at pretentious Wiki Godlyhood.

We list FACTS here, not useless POV trivia. :: DarkLordSeth 15:21, (UTC) Besides, all memes and "famous poster"s are highly POV some people might think of a meme as the next best thing as sliced bread, others may hate it. The memes and "famous poster" bits ARE useless trivia. On Wikipedia we don't include useless trivia.

There are lots of famous little tidbits about lots of things.

Your justification is limiting it to not giving the memes their own article.

If it's famous as part of 4chan, then surely the memes should be listed.

However, in-depth explanations of the 4chan's memes are not to be considered encyclopedic. :: DarkLordSeth 00:00, (UTC) Encyclopedic information about 4chan would be some details about it's origins, the fact it's been declared dead half a dozen times and that's pretty much it.

These memes are NOT widely known enough to justify inclusion in here. If it's famous to just 4chan and not the rest of the world, it should remain on 4chan.Just because it's not famous to the rest of the Web doesn't mean it's not famous to 4chan. Also, they're referenced by users and by the 4chan community. Memes, at least the widespread ones, are PART of 4chan culture and thus deserve to be included. It's an encyclopedia entry about 4chan culture. Any objections with good reasoning? :: DarkLordSeth 14:59, (UTC)

#4chan pol into the trash it goes archive#

I'll archive them to the talk page if you want. Once something reaching the level of " All your base are belong to us", THEN it's big enough to include in Wikipedia.

Second of all, none of those memes are famous or well-known enough to be even worthy of mention on here. First of all, this kind of stuff doesn't belong in an excyclopedia. I'm more thinking of removal instead of streamlining.Any objections with good reasoning? :: DarkLordSeth 00:00, (UTC) Together with the fact that the memes are a complete mess and not really fit for inclusion in an encyclopedia, I think they should be removed. ), interesting nor well-known on other communities. Why the hell are all memes listed? None of them are particulary funny ( some are actually painfully unfunny. Azure Haights 22:53, (UTC) Memes/Popular 4chan culture You're not fully meme unless you're zestfully meme. You forgot to add the most zestful and jocular meme of Nevada-Tan. Paul Soth 17:06, (UTC)įor the archived debate related to this article see Talk:4chan/delete - Graham ☺ | Talk 02:03, (UTC) Last damn thing we need is the glorification of trolls. Whole thing looked like a vanity job anyway. I agree, I'ven't (yay?) even heard any of the memes he is supposed to use. Sweet Christ, do we really need that much on him in the article? Hell, do we even need to mention him beyond the CockMongler? - Paul Soth 20:52, (UTC) It's too vague to be considered notable and "I'd hit it" isn't really 4chan exclusive. For one thing, we don't need a list of all of 4chan's boards there isn't a list of Futaba's boards.ĭerived from "I'd hit it" after an animated gif of a guy fucking a girl's feet with the socks half on. Someone ought to rewrite it from scratch. Was it meant this way?Īdded a line to the top stating that 4chan was coming back under new management. HAY GUYZ what's going on? This page looks just like /b/. Should i add that 4chan is about to die again and they need donations or would that be advertising?Īs long as you do not say "please go donate there right now!" or something to that effect, that would be stating a fact, not advertising.